Popular Posts

Friday, October 14, 2011

Journal Week 4:

I have not made any new transactions this week, but a recent stock that i purchased was (GOOG) Google. I bought this stock for 549.70 a share. Wasn't worth it in the begining, but in the 52 week range its suppose to go up a few percentage amounts. And so far its doing well. Bing is one of googles biggest competitors; why? because bing tries to give out more information, details, and pictures like google, but google has more informaion.

11 comments:

  1. You did a good job talking about the competitors but you left out the sector it's in and why you bought it. You also needed a little more information on the 52 week range Other then that you did a fairly good job.

    ReplyDelete
  2. all the info you have put said is good but you really need to start making transactions. but good job on how you said how much you have bought this stock.

    ReplyDelete
  3. i like how you made google look a lot better than bing. the numbers you gave were good also.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think we are supposed to make at least 2 transactions a week, so you may want to focus on that for next week. Remember that buying, selling, short selling, and covering are all transactions that you can write about. Giving some more information about Bing like their market cap etc. Was GOOG a trade or an investment for you? Why do you think it will be going up a few percentage points? What sector is it in? These are all things needed in your transaction, but you have a good start.

    ReplyDelete
  5. maybe expand a little bit more but good reasoning so far.

    ReplyDelete
  6. awesome job paris =)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Trade or investment? Good info to start but need to build more depth into the reasoning. Would like a more definite prediction

    ReplyDelete
  8. Good job. Just add more information next time.

    ReplyDelete
  9. could use a little more info like if you said how much you think it would go up

    ReplyDelete
  10. good job, your information was clear, but you possibly could have added some more information

    ReplyDelete